Farm Subsidy information
Dawson County, Nebraska
Total Subsidies in Dawson County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 3,343
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Dawson County, Nebraska totaled $555,806,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | O'neill Family Farms | Sumner, NE 68878 | $941,945 |
102 | Sitorius Farms | Gothenburg, NE 69138 | $941,068 |
103 | Katherine France | Gothenburg, NE 69138 | $939,242 |
104 | Joe D France | Gothenburg, NE 69138 | $932,890 |
105 | Ford Farms | Oconto, NE 68860 | $929,207 |
106 | Ourada Cattle Co | Lexington, NE 68850 | $928,240 |
107 | Jobman Farms Inc | Gothenburg, NE 69138 | $927,934 |
108 | Russell R Spradlin | Cozad, NE 69130 | $927,001 |
109 | Margritz Farms Inc | Lexington, NE 68850 | $915,380 |
110 | Mitchell D Ourada | Overton, NE 68863 | $909,214 |
111 | Pramberg Livestock Inc | Gothenburg, NE 69138 | $906,865 |
112 | Ds Strauss Inc | Lexington, NE 68850 | $906,724 |
113 | Hammond Livestock Inc | Lexington, NE 68850 | $906,203 |
114 | Ross Ristine | Gothenburg, NE 69138 | $889,621 |
115 | R & S Farms Inc | Lexington, NE 68850 | $887,291 |
116 | Roland And Theresa Anderson Trust | Eustis, NE 69028 | $877,913 |
117 | Wayne R Brockmeier | Cozad, NE 69130 | $877,182 |
118 | Date Enterprises | Cozad, NE 69130 | $867,568 |
119 | Hueftle Farms Inc | Eustis, NE 69028 | $857,515 |
120 | Michael A Block | Cozad, NE 69130 | $856,853 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”