Loan Deficiency in Deuel County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 640
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Deuel County, Nebraska totaled $7,141,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Billy - The Billy & Roberta Clark Fam Tr D Clark | Chappell, NE 69129 | $58,130 |
22 | V & F Farms Inc | Chappell, NE 69129 | $57,192 |
23 | Robert M Paulsen | Chappell, NE 69129 | $56,846 |
24 | B & D Farms | Chappell, NE 69129 | $56,728 |
25 | Philip J Armstrong | Brule, NE 69127 | $56,279 |
26 | Alan J Bieber | Big Springs, NE 69122 | $55,952 |
27 | Floyd Max Soper | Big Springs, NE 69122 | $54,778 |
28 | Glen Bruns & Son Inc | Chappell, NE 69129 | $54,425 |
29 | Burton L Carter | Lincoln, NE 68516 | $53,684 |
30 | L K Stoppel Real Estate Inc | Julesburg, CO 80737 | $50,162 |
31 | L And M Farms Inc | Chappell, NE 69129 | $49,959 |
32 | Twila Sick | Chappell, NE 69129 | $47,278 |
33 | Rms Inc | Lakewood, CO 80215 | $47,181 |
34 | Grace Land And Cattle Co | Lewellen, NE 69147 | $46,997 |
35 | Larry-larry G Flohr G Flohr | Chappell, NE 69129 | $46,512 |
36 | Marvin Brent Rageth | Byron, WY 82412 | $45,339 |
37 | Russell Fornstrom | Upton, WY 82730 | $44,818 |
38 | Baumann Partnership | Omaha, NE 68142 | $44,658 |
39 | Tri-k Farms Inc | Cumberland Foreside, ME 04110 | $44,537 |
40 | Grace Farms Inc | Lewellen, NE 69147 | $43,290 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”