Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Deuel County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 233
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Deuel County, Nebraska totaled $4,333,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Kent Mauser | Big Springs, NE 69122 | $29,059 |
42 | M Craig Kinoshita | Chappell, NE 69129 | $28,112 |
43 | Matthew Klingman | Chappell, NE 69129 | $27,089 |
44 | Edson Farms LLC | Chappell, NE 69129 | $26,418 |
45 | Darrell Zorn | Big Springs, NE 69122 | $26,148 |
46 | Twe II LLC | Los Gatos, CA 95030 | $26,102 |
47 | Floyd Max Soper | Big Springs, NE 69122 | $25,634 |
48 | Kara Dorenne Essman | Chappell, NE 69129 | $25,416 |
49 | Ron Timm | Chappell, NE 69129 | $24,540 |
50 | Leo Jessen Wyobraska Inc | Scottsbluff, NE 69363 | $24,461 |
51 | Mcclung Farms Inc | Big Springs, NE 69122 | $23,148 |
52 | Jon T Carter | Chappell, NE 69129 | $21,835 |
53 | Mcgreer Brothers Gen Ptnrship | Big Springs, NE 69122 | $20,406 |
54 | Merle D Johnson | Chappell, NE 69129 | $19,936 |
55 | John Ervin | Brule, NE 69127 | $19,025 |
56 | Peter A Walter | Ovid, CO 80744 | $18,791 |
57 | Michael R Ness | Julesburg, CO 80737 | $18,027 |
58 | Jerrod B Toepfer | Lewellen, NE 69147 | $17,836 |
59 | Diaz Farms | Julesburg, CO 80737 | $17,268 |
60 | Larry L Hansen | Chappell, NE 69129 | $15,897 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”