Conservation Reserve Program in Deuel County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 319
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Deuel County, Nebraska totaled $11,305,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Janice F Kalb | Chappell, NE 69129 | $24,604 |
102 | Rosemary S Ochsner | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $24,588 |
103 | Calvin J Dyer | Eaton, CO 80615 | $23,611 |
104 | Wayne Peterson Co | Pueblo, CO 81007 | $23,292 |
105 | Elwin Tophoj | Lincoln, NE 68505 | $22,832 |
106 | Harry Rochlitz | Big Springs, NE 69122 | $22,673 |
107 | Galen N Bagby | Big Springs, NE 69122 | $22,433 |
108 | Matt Kalb | Chappell, NE 69129 | $22,365 |
109 | Harold Pidgeon Trust | Fort Collins, CO 80528 | $21,841 |
110 | I-m Palser Farms Inc | Big Springs, NE 69122 | $21,509 |
111 | Donald Freeman Estate | Chappell, NE 69129 | $20,860 |
112 | Vernon D Clark | Holland, MI 49424 | $20,604 |
113 | Michael Thomas Jr | Ogallala, NE 69153 | $20,533 |
114 | Irene M Johnson Living Trust | Midwest City, OK 73130 | $20,487 |
115 | Neil Stretesky | Big Springs, NE 69122 | $19,932 |
116 | Rms Inc 99 | Chappell, NE 69129 | $18,996 |
117 | Donna Akeson Living Trust | Warrensburg, MO 64093 | $18,919 |
118 | Larry L Wright | Midland, TX 79705 | $18,825 |
119 | Marvin R And Carol A Rogers Trust | Scottsbluff, NE 69361 | $18,535 |
120 | Randy L Rogers | Wichita, KS 67203 | $18,535 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”