Farm Subsidy information
Deuel County, Nebraska
Total Subsidies in Deuel County, Nebraska, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 270
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Deuel County, Nebraska totaled $5,743,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Richard Mikoloyck | Oshkosh, NE 69154 | $3,023 |
142 | Mcfee Properties LLC | Colorado Springs, CO 80919 | $2,954 |
143 | Frances M Fornander | Chappell, NE 69129 | $2,843 |
144 | Susan L Putman | Lincoln, NE 68506 | $2,821 |
145 | Dale W Hummermeier | Chappell, NE 69129 | $2,765 |
146 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $2,704 |
147 | Wavalee Mcartor | Scottsdale, AZ 85260 | $2,613 |
148 | Edward H Lutkehus - Edward H Lutkehus And Drucilla | Chappell, NE 69129 | $2,613 |
149 | Marilyn M Bourne Trust | Lincoln, NE 68508 | $2,598 |
150 | Leonard D Wiegand | Oshkosh, NE 69154 | $2,484 |
151 | Robert V Frank III LLC | Greeley, CO 80634 | $2,422 |
152 | Double X Enterprises | Lemoyne, NE 69146 | $2,400 |
153 | Parker Tait Leo Jessen | Oshkosh, NE 69154 | $2,352 |
154 | Charles M Steward | Big Springs, NE 69122 | $2,335 |
155 | Ken Lindbloom | Poncha Springs, CO 81242 | $2,324 |
156 | Boone Farms | Sidney, NE 69162 | $2,305 |
157 | James M Clark | Oshkosh, NE 69154 | $2,294 |
158 | Michael Wiest | Lodgepole, NE 69149 | $2,267 |
159 | Ryder Jenik | Sedgwick, CO 80749 | $2,221 |
160 | Burton L Carter Family Trust | Ogallala, NE 69153 | $2,211 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”