Total Conservation Programs in Dodge County, Nebraska, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 223
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Dodge County, Nebraska totaled $702,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Muller Farms Inc | Scribner, NE 68057 | $7,163 |
22 | Doris E Moser Credit Trust | Fremont, NE 68025 | $7,159 |
23 | Quail Ridge Farms Inc | Elkhorn, NE 68022 | $6,999 |
24 | Paseka Farms Inc | Ames, NE 68621 | $6,924 |
25 | Sherryl Kment | Hooper, NE 68031 | $6,863 |
26 | K & K Farms | Fremont, NE 68025 | $6,804 |
27 | Charles M Dake | Hooper, NE 68031 | $6,512 |
28 | Dale Larson | Lincoln, NE 68512 | $5,997 |
29 | Duane R Larson - Duane Roland Larson And Lanelle H | Fremont, NE 68025 | $5,997 |
30 | Chris Popken | Hooper, NE 68031 | $5,801 |
31 | Ames Farm LLC | Fremont, NE 68025 | $5,704 |
32 | Sheila Lemmert | Lincoln, NE 68507 | $5,461 |
33 | Lois Von Seggern Revocable Trust | Scribner, NE 68057 | $5,441 |
34 | Mary Ellen Bell Rev Trust | Lincoln, NE 68516 | $5,410 |
35 | Chester M Bell Irrevocable Trust | Bennet, NE 68317 | $5,410 |
36 | Jeffrey E Hanson | Fremont, NE 68025 | $5,285 |
37 | Von Seggern Farm Inc | Scribner, NE 68057 | $5,205 |
38 | Steffensmeier Ag Inc | Scribner, NE 68057 | $5,143 |
39 | Hansen Homestead | Lincoln, NE 68521 | $4,952 |
40 | Alan Kamrath - Alan D. Kamrath Rev. Trust | Lincoln, NE 68512 | $4,842 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”