Conservation Reserve Program in Douglas County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 147
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Douglas County, Nebraska totaled $2,279,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Beyer Investments Limited Partner | Elkhorn, NE 68022 | $34,671 |
22 | Father Flanagan's Boys' Home | Boys Town, NE 68010 | $32,843 |
23 | Roger G Lewis | Bennington, NE 68007 | $31,654 |
24 | Roy Johnson Family Partnership | Mount Vernon, IA 52314 | $31,470 |
25 | Roger Bruce Osmanson | Fort Calhoun, NE 68023 | $29,586 |
26 | Robert J Wemhoff | Elkhorn, NE 68022 | $25,209 |
27 | Lonnie L Peterson | Valley, NE 68064 | $23,147 |
28 | Ryan Ueberrhein | Elkhorn, NE 68022 | $23,147 |
29 | Steven Jacobsen | Omaha, NE 68142 | $22,185 |
30 | Virgil P Wamsat Living Trust | Omaha, NE 68137 | $21,664 |
31 | William J Appleby Rev Trust | Valley, NE 68064 | $21,278 |
32 | Tim Shanahan | Cedar Bluffs, NE 68015 | $21,163 |
33 | Dennis L Carlson | Blair, NE 68008 | $20,899 |
34 | Paul W Stranghoener & Jayne I Stranghoener Tr | Arlington, NE 68002 | $18,500 |
35 | Grace Revocable Trust | Elkhorn, NE 68022 | $17,930 |
36 | Robert D Flynn Jr | Valley, NE 68064 | $16,737 |
37 | Broken Arrow Land & Cattle Co | Elkhorn, NE 68022 | $16,571 |
38 | Ralph Nielsen | Elkhorn, NE 68022 | $15,607 |
39 | Rose Ellen Beyer | Omaha, NE 68152 | $14,770 |
40 | William Birge | Bennington, NE 68007 | $14,009 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”