Emergency Conservation Program in Franklin County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 120
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Franklin County, Nebraska totaled $807,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Marilyn R Hays | Hildreth, NE 68947 | $12,658 |
22 | The Delton And Janet Blank Family | Wilcox, NE 68982 | $12,336 |
23 | Robert L Duncan | Franklin, NE 68939 | $12,055 |
24 | D & R Potter Family Ltd Ptns | North Platte, NE 69101 | $10,956 |
25 | Bartels Land & Cattle Inc | Riverton, NE 68972 | $10,752 |
26 | Douglas W Zuellner Tr | Campbell, NE 68932 | $10,748 |
27 | Myron Dallmann | Franklin, NE 68939 | $10,506 |
28 | Michael Dean Schurman | Hastings, NE 68901 | $10,416 |
29 | Angela M Blank | Wilcox, NE 68982 | $10,268 |
30 | James Farms Inc | Riverton, NE 68972 | $10,060 |
31 | Keith Steinkruger | Franklin, NE 68939 | $10,042 |
32 | Bruce Steinkruger | Upland, NE 68981 | $9,905 |
33 | J-d Farms Inc | Riverton, NE 68972 | $9,836 |
34 | James Olson | Franklin, NE 68939 | $9,579 |
35 | Leann Woollen | Ord, NE 68862 | $9,255 |
36 | Ardyce Haring Nebraska Prairie Re | Alpine, TX 79831 | $9,006 |
37 | Steve Schmidt | Riverton, NE 68972 | $8,554 |
38 | Rodney Steinkruger | Franklin, NE 68939 | $7,613 |
39 | Ronny A Meyer | Doniphan, NE 68832 | $7,413 |
40 | James Howard Bergman Estate | Riverton, NE 68972 | $6,796 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”