Farm Subsidy information
Franklin County, Nebraska
Total Subsidies in Franklin County, Nebraska, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 224
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Franklin County, Nebraska totaled $9,340,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Larry D Janicek | Naponee, NE 68960 | $3,975 |
142 | Dennis Mietzner | Hildreth, NE 68947 | $3,964 |
143 | Ian C James | Bloomington, NE 68929 | $3,920 |
144 | Nelson Preston Trambly | Campbell, NE 68932 | $3,851 |
145 | Kelly Eileen Trambly | Campbell, NE 68932 | $3,851 |
146 | James J Robinson | Bloomington, NE 68929 | $3,818 |
147 | Randall Lienemann | Hildreth, NE 68947 | $3,781 |
148 | Vicki Mae Morgan | Campbell, NE 68932 | $3,773 |
149 | Robert Stolz | Holdrege, NE 68949 | $3,646 |
150 | Jimmie Joe Morgan | Campbell, NE 68932 | $3,626 |
151 | Dean Dallmann | Franklin, NE 68939 | $3,503 |
152 | Rydell Lienemann | Hildreth, NE 68947 | $3,281 |
153 | C W Ranch Inc | Franklin, NE 68939 | $3,087 |
154 | Dallas Volk | Upland, NE 68981 | $3,032 |
155 | Grandma's Farm Legacy, LLC | Alma, NE 68920 | $2,967 |
156 | Delores I Johnson | Bloomington, NE 68929 | $2,962 |
157 | , | $2,909 | |
158 | Double Down Farms, Inc | Minden, NE 68959 | $2,830 |
159 | David Schubert | Wilcox, NE 68982 | $2,778 |
160 | Merle D Dorn | Franklin, NE 68939 | $2,757 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”