Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Furnas County, Nebraska, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 222
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Furnas County, Nebraska totaled $2,061,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Daniell L Warner | Arapahoe, NE 68922 | $81,231 |
2 | Steven W Whipple | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $57,564 |
3 | Blickenstaff & Son Inc | Wilsonville, NE 69046 | $52,021 |
4 | Bart Deterding | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $45,114 |
5 | Monte Warner | Beaver City, NE 68926 | $41,473 |
6 | Nicholas M Brown | Wilsonville, NE 69046 | $41,103 |
7 | Chipper Witte | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $40,266 |
8 | Klinkebiel Cattle Company | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $37,506 |
9 | Tim Petersen | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $37,360 |
10 | Grazers Inc | Arapahoe, NE 68922 | $33,237 |
11 | Ballou & Son Inc | Wilsonville, NE 69046 | $32,054 |
12 | David Johnson | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $31,746 |
13 | Darcy Johnson | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $31,746 |
14 | Roger Witte | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $31,334 |
15 | Trenchard Ranch Inc | Clay Center, NE 68933 | $29,391 |
16 | , | $28,467 | |
17 | Jerome Michael Becker | Beaver City, NE 68926 | $28,185 |
18 | Matthew Lynn Kasson | Wilsonville, NE 69046 | $27,290 |
19 | Isaac Watson | Edison, NE 68936 | $27,158 |
20 | Theron R Andrews | Holbrook, NE 68948 | $25,989 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>