Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Furnas County, Nebraska, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 383
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Furnas County, Nebraska totaled $4,644,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Blake Biskup | Wilcox, NE 68982 | $42,915 |
22 | Clark Andrews | Holbrook, NE 68948 | $42,764 |
23 | Matthew Lynn Kasson | Wilsonville, NE 69046 | $42,191 |
24 | Roger Witte | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $41,746 |
25 | Tim Petersen | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $40,923 |
26 | Anita J Petersen | Kearney, NE 68847 | $40,922 |
27 | Toby Allen Tenbensel | Holbrook, NE 68948 | $39,862 |
28 | Troy D Tenbensel | Arapahoe, NE 68922 | $39,859 |
29 | Monte Warner | Beaver City, NE 68926 | $39,721 |
30 | Nicholas M Brown | Wilsonville, NE 69046 | $39,281 |
31 | Crum Creek Land & Livestock Inc | Arapahoe, NE 68922 | $38,321 |
32 | William R Sandman Revocable Trust | Diller, NE 68342 | $38,149 |
33 | Francis Farms Inc | Wilsonville, NE 69046 | $37,116 |
34 | Tanner Vaughn Hays | Alma, NE 68920 | $36,476 |
35 | David Johnson | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $36,171 |
36 | Darcy Johnson | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $36,171 |
37 | Melvin Roy Christensen | Arapahoe, NE 68922 | $36,044 |
38 | Travis D Theobald | Beaver City, NE 68926 | $34,406 |
39 | Anthony Scott Fisher | Edison, NE 68936 | $33,384 |
40 | Baily Land & Cattle Inc | Oxford, NE 68967 | $33,016 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”