Total Conservation Programs in Furnas County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 810
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Furnas County, Nebraska totaled $30,376,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Eric & Steph Maaske Gp | Kearney, NE 68848 | $234,596 |
22 | Mariann Earlley | Wilsonville, NE 69046 | $230,033 |
23 | David Maaske | Oxford, NE 68967 | $226,010 |
24 | Roger Long | Holbrook, NE 68948 | $219,848 |
25 | Todd Brown | Oxford, NE 68967 | $216,500 |
26 | Marjorie A Gardner Family Trust | Edison, NE 68936 | $215,145 |
27 | Ihling Lee Carskadon | Edison, NE 68936 | $214,213 |
28 | Ron Gardner Distributing Inc | Edison, NE 68936 | $211,421 |
29 | Vernon Bletscher | Arapahoe, NE 68922 | $209,737 |
30 | Walter Clarence Courtright | Los Alamos, NM 87544 | $202,672 |
31 | John M Koller | Arapahoe, NE 68922 | $194,869 |
32 | James Bernard Lueking | Oxford, NE 68967 | $194,319 |
33 | Hill Land Co | Arapahoe, NE 68922 | $187,216 |
34 | Highland Farm & Ranch LLC | Kearney, NE 68848 | $186,627 |
35 | Marvin Briegel | Arapahoe, NE 68922 | $186,620 |
36 | Dean Tenbensel | Arapahoe, NE 68922 | $174,372 |
37 | Richard L Campbell | Beaver City, NE 68926 | $161,887 |
38 | Robert D Gross | Holbrook, NE 68948 | $155,861 |
39 | Barbara Brownsmith Campbell | Asheville, NC 28804 | $147,604 |
40 | Steven W Whipple | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $147,489 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”