Farm Subsidy information
Furnas County, Nebraska
Total Subsidies in Furnas County, Nebraska, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 642
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Furnas County, Nebraska totaled $18,993,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Deterding Land & Cattle, Inc. | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $52,412 |
42 | Hardenbrook Farms Inc | Beaver City, NE 68926 | $52,221 |
43 | Drew Allen Tenbensel | Arapahoe, NE 68922 | $51,579 |
44 | Melvin S Thomas | Beaver City, NE 68926 | $51,121 |
45 | Travis D Theobald | Beaver City, NE 68926 | $50,902 |
46 | Leora Anderson | Arapahoe, NE 68922 | $50,151 |
47 | Judith Maline | Holbrook, NE 68948 | $50,000 |
48 | Chipper Witte | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $49,197 |
49 | Hardin Farms Inc | Kearney, NE 68848 | $48,214 |
50 | Blake Biskup | Wilcox, NE 68982 | $47,494 |
51 | Francis Farms Inc | Wilsonville, NE 69046 | $46,872 |
52 | Toby Allen Tenbensel | Holbrook, NE 68948 | $46,668 |
53 | Troy D Tenbensel | Arapahoe, NE 68922 | $46,663 |
54 | Ron Gardner Distributing Inc | Edison, NE 68936 | $46,564 |
55 | Crum Creek Land & Livestock Inc | Arapahoe, NE 68922 | $46,373 |
56 | Mr Douglas Dea Palmer | Wilsonville, NE 69046 | $46,305 |
57 | A M V LLC | Edison, NE 68936 | $46,061 |
58 | Douglas Witte | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $45,738 |
59 | R R H Johnson Farms LLC | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $45,713 |
60 | Grazers Inc | Arapahoe, NE 68922 | $45,244 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”