Total Disaster Programs in Furnas County, Nebraska, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 336
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Furnas County, Nebraska totaled $6,995,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Dallas J Palmer | Wilsonville, NE 69046 | $28,995 |
62 | Kenneth Tenbensel | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $28,751 |
63 | Brian J Ballou | Wilsonville, NE 69046 | $28,704 |
64 | Cody L Hill | Arapahoe, NE 68922 | $28,358 |
65 | Jerome Michael Becker | Beaver City, NE 68926 | $28,185 |
66 | Jay C Sayer | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $27,615 |
67 | Charles Scott Eubanks | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $26,340 |
68 | Circle S Farms Inc | Oxford, NE 68967 | $26,084 |
69 | David Becker Dba D & L Farms | Beaver City, NE 68926 | $25,873 |
70 | Melvin Roy Christensen | Arapahoe, NE 68922 | $25,853 |
71 | Anthony Scott Fisher | Edison, NE 68936 | $25,320 |
72 | Patricia Schluntz | Oxford, NE 68967 | $25,279 |
73 | Craig Lamprecht | Oxford, NE 68967 | $24,986 |
74 | Joel Matthew Schutz | Arapahoe, NE 68922 | $24,478 |
75 | Ryan Charles Huxoll | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $24,112 |
76 | Mill Iron B Cattle Company LLC | Stamford, NE 68977 | $23,800 |
77 | David Schwanz | Alma, NE 68920 | $23,744 |
78 | Willis Hunt | Hastings, NE 68901 | $23,323 |
79 | Robert C Blecha | Beaver City, NE 68926 | $23,204 |
80 | Tyler Jade Hamel | Arapahoe, NE 68922 | $22,962 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”