Farm Subsidy information
Furnas County, Nebraska
Total Subsidies in Furnas County, Nebraska, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 480
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Furnas County, Nebraska totaled $21,574,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Hardin Farms Inc | Kearney, NE 68848 | $29,021 |
82 | Dallas J Palmer | Wilsonville, NE 69046 | $28,995 |
83 | Cody L Hill | Arapahoe, NE 68922 | $28,882 |
84 | Kenneth Tenbensel | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $28,751 |
85 | Brian J Ballou | Wilsonville, NE 69046 | $28,704 |
86 | Jerome Michael Becker | Beaver City, NE 68926 | $28,185 |
87 | Jay C Sayer | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $27,615 |
88 | , | $27,256 | |
89 | Charles Scott Eubanks | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $26,340 |
90 | Circle S Farms Inc | Oxford, NE 68967 | $26,084 |
91 | David Becker Dba D & L Farms | Beaver City, NE 68926 | $25,873 |
92 | Anthony Scott Fisher | Edison, NE 68936 | $25,320 |
93 | Patricia Schluntz | Oxford, NE 68967 | $25,279 |
94 | Mariann Earlley | Wilsonville, NE 69046 | $25,224 |
95 | Dallas Roy Christensen | Edison, NE 68936 | $24,992 |
96 | Craig Lamprecht | Oxford, NE 68967 | $24,986 |
97 | Jay Dee Wolzen | Stamford, NE 68977 | $24,948 |
98 | Joel Matthew Schutz | Arapahoe, NE 68922 | $24,478 |
99 | Ryan Charles Huxoll | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $24,112 |
100 | Mill Iron B Cattle Company LLC | Stamford, NE 68977 | $23,800 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”