Market Loss Assistance Program in Furnas County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 956
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Furnas County, Nebraska totaled $17,494,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Rhynalds Corp | Oxford, NE 68967 | $62,319 |
82 | Eugene Clason | Beaver City, NE 68926 | $62,250 |
83 | Douglas Palmer | Wilsonville, NE 69046 | $61,930 |
84 | Republican Valley Windworks | Holbrook, NE 68948 | $61,755 |
85 | John G Sayer | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $61,616 |
86 | Buy My Hay LLC Dba S R Farms Gp | Wilsonville, NE 69046 | $61,112 |
87 | Donald Hardenbrook | Beaver City, NE 68926 | $60,982 |
88 | Eric J Youngquist | Beaver City, NE 68926 | $59,572 |
89 | Ralph Best | Oxford, NE 68967 | $58,996 |
90 | Douglas Witte | Wilsonville, NE 69046 | $58,963 |
91 | Dean Johnson | Oxford, NE 68967 | $58,006 |
92 | Royce Bose & Company Inc | Orleans, NE 68966 | $57,300 |
93 | Mark R Christensen | Imperial, NE 69033 | $57,287 |
94 | Rodney D Best | Edison, NE 68936 | $57,282 |
95 | Robert Warner Jr | Arapahoe, NE 68922 | $57,210 |
96 | Manuel Ruf | Wilsonville, NE 69046 | $56,934 |
97 | Gary Dean Brown | Wilsonville, NE 69046 | $56,463 |
98 | Jon C Youngquist | Beaver City, NE 68926 | $55,848 |
99 | David Schwanz | Alma, NE 68920 | $55,805 |
100 | Terry Vaughn Hays | Edison, NE 68936 | $55,159 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”