Loan Deficiency in Furnas County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,053
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Furnas County, Nebraska totaled $21,901,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | David A Hyke | Wilsonville, NE 69046 | $61,413 |
102 | Charles Hermes | Hastings, NE 68902 | $60,846 |
103 | Kenneth Houghtelling | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $60,687 |
104 | Dennis Clason | Beaver City, NE 68926 | $60,356 |
105 | Terry Vaughn Hays | Edison, NE 68936 | $60,203 |
106 | Dorothy Marie Henry | Lincoln, NE 68508 | $59,866 |
107 | Neale L Schroeder | Arapahoe, NE 68922 | $58,726 |
108 | C Douglas Breinig | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $58,124 |
109 | Anastasia Petersen | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $57,910 |
110 | Jim Crosley | Wilsonville, NE 69046 | $57,899 |
111 | Steve Witte | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $57,318 |
112 | Eugene Clason | Beaver City, NE 68926 | $56,527 |
113 | Schluntz Family Farms Inc | Stamford, NE 68977 | $55,533 |
114 | Willis Hunt | Hastings, NE 68901 | $55,417 |
115 | Lynn Perkins | Beaver City, NE 68926 | $55,367 |
116 | Maaske Farms Ltd Ptr | Oxford, NE 68967 | $55,264 |
117 | Lonny Klinkebiel Estate | Holbrook, NE 68948 | $55,083 |
118 | Ryan Louis Hunt | Beaver City, NE 68926 | $54,597 |
119 | Douglas Palmer | Wilsonville, NE 69046 | $54,258 |
120 | Charles A Breinig Estate | Arapahoe, NE 68922 | $54,077 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”