Market Loss Assistance Program in Furnas County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 956
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Furnas County, Nebraska totaled $17,494,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | K Dale Fults | Beaver City, NE 68926 | $36,322 |
162 | Leon Lyon | Alma, NE 68920 | $36,000 |
163 | Alan D Lamb | Seminole, FL 33777 | $35,974 |
164 | Robert O Marshall | Beaver City, NE 68926 | $35,963 |
165 | John D Anderson | Arapahoe, NE 68922 | $35,482 |
166 | Anastasia Petersen | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $34,751 |
167 | Gina Petersen | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $34,734 |
168 | Eldon Mock | Holbrook, NE 68948 | $34,634 |
169 | Roger Rikli | Lincoln, NE 68512 | $34,633 |
170 | Horace E Collins Jr | Norton, KS 67654 | $34,599 |
171 | Randy & David Brown Jv | Beaver City, NE 68926 | $34,398 |
172 | Klinkebiel Farms Inc | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $34,381 |
173 | Jay Dee Wolzen | Stamford, NE 68977 | $34,142 |
174 | Neale L Schroeder | Arapahoe, NE 68922 | $33,657 |
175 | Morris C Kubik | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $33,289 |
176 | Kenneth Tenbensel | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $33,265 |
177 | Carl A Tenbensel | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $33,056 |
178 | Jim Crosley | Wilsonville, NE 69046 | $32,846 |
179 | Elden Earlley | Wilsonville, NE 69046 | $32,302 |
180 | Martin Huxoll | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $32,191 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”