Farm Subsidy information
Furnas County, Nebraska
Total Subsidies in Furnas County, Nebraska, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 684
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Furnas County, Nebraska totaled $31,771,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Anthony Scott Fisher | Edison, NE 68936 | $206,634 |
22 | Roger Witte | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $202,823 |
23 | Becker Farms Inc | Beaver City, NE 68926 | $196,617 |
24 | Hyke Farms LLC | Wilsonville, NE 69046 | $195,058 |
25 | Hardenbrook Farms Inc | Beaver City, NE 68926 | $194,942 |
26 | Rex A Mcclain | Arapahoe, NE 68922 | $189,079 |
27 | C Kasson Inc | Wilsonville, NE 69046 | $182,104 |
28 | Steven P Hunt | Beaver City, NE 68926 | $180,325 |
29 | Tim Petersen | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $175,070 |
30 | Anita J Petersen | Kearney, NE 68847 | $174,880 |
31 | Klinkebiel Farms Inc | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $174,567 |
32 | David Johnson | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $172,983 |
33 | Darcy Johnson | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $172,617 |
34 | Deterding Land & Cattle, Inc. | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $170,807 |
35 | Eric & Steph Maaske Gp | Kearney, NE 68848 | $169,436 |
36 | Tanner Vaughn Hays | Alma, NE 68920 | $164,649 |
37 | Drew Allen Tenbensel | Arapahoe, NE 68922 | $162,629 |
38 | Matthew Lynn Kasson | Wilsonville, NE 69046 | $159,943 |
39 | Darren Warner | Edison, NE 68936 | $159,870 |
40 | Ballou & Son Inc | Wilsonville, NE 69046 | $159,313 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”