Total Commodity Programs in Garden County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,123
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Garden County, Nebraska totaled $68,910,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | William F Pollard | Oshkosh, NE 69154 | $198,495 |
102 | Pgr Limited Partnership | Bingham, NE 69335 | $197,727 |
103 | Jon T Carter | Chappell, NE 69129 | $193,293 |
104 | Frankie Joe Lussetto | Broadwater, NE 69125 | $192,876 |
105 | Douglas A Criswell | Chappell, NE 69129 | $186,448 |
106 | Myron Peterson | Oshkosh, NE 69154 | $185,380 |
107 | Leo Jessen Wyobraska Inc | Scottsbluff, NE 69363 | $181,823 |
108 | Nebraska State Bank ** | Oshkosh, NE 69154 | $181,066 |
109 | Ivan Leroy Thelander | Oshkosh, NE 69154 | $177,445 |
110 | Brent A Thelander | Grant, NE 69140 | $175,870 |
111 | Wayne Munsey | Oshkosh, NE 69154 | $175,454 |
112 | Chad Dormann | Lisco, NE 69148 | $174,416 |
113 | Bruce And Ellen Burdick Family L | Lewellen, NE 69147 | $173,985 |
114 | Patrick Mccormick | Lewellen, NE 69147 | $172,807 |
115 | Van Newkirk Herefords Ltd Co | Oshkosh, NE 69154 | $171,582 |
116 | James B Rittenhouse | Lewellen, NE 69147 | $169,987 |
117 | Braskaland LLC | Fort Collins, CO 80525 | $167,970 |
118 | Bondegard Farms Inc | Lodgepole, NE 69149 | $167,012 |
119 | Gene R Schmid | Oshkosh, NE 69154 | $162,566 |
120 | Ronald L Sick | Lodgepole, NE 69149 | $160,191 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”