Total Conservation Programs in Gosper County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 403
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Gosper County, Nebraska totaled $10,069,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Ernest E Fiene Jr Estate | Omaha, NE 69135 | $10,693 |
142 | Toomey Farms Nebraska Partnership | Arapahoe, NE 68922 | $10,599 |
143 | Donna Wasson | Boulder, CO 80305 | $10,510 |
144 | Knoerzer Farms Inc | Elwood, NE 68937 | $10,500 |
145 | Wilbur L Brell Inc | Elwood, NE 68937 | $10,500 |
146 | Geiger Inc | Cozad, NE 69130 | $10,500 |
147 | Tmj Inc | Smithfield, NE 68976 | $10,500 |
148 | Verlouis-forster Fam Forster | Smithfield, NE 68976 | $10,500 |
149 | Joan L Lilyhorn | Bertrand, NE 68927 | $10,500 |
150 | Doug M Lilyhorn | Bertrand, NE 68927 | $10,500 |
151 | Bonnie Deboer | Smithfield, NE 68976 | $10,500 |
152 | Bryant W Knoerzer | Elwood, NE 68937 | $10,500 |
153 | Hibbs Farms Inc | Elwood, NE 68937 | $10,458 |
154 | Tom Olesen | Smithfield, NE 68976 | $10,425 |
155 | Vaugn Leggott | Elwood, NE 68937 | $10,423 |
156 | Shirley Robb | Smithfield, NE 68976 | $10,361 |
157 | Gaylord Robb | Smithfield, NE 68976 | $10,361 |
158 | Double S Land & Cattle Co | Holdrege, NE 68949 | $10,206 |
159 | Cynthia Faye Wendell | Smithfield, NE 68976 | $9,791 |
160 | Monte Lynn Wendell | Smithfield, NE 68976 | $9,680 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”