Loan Deficiency in Hall County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,511
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Hall County, Nebraska totaled $50,239,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Roy D Stoltenberg | Cairo, NE 68824 | $171,165 |
62 | Schimmer Farms Inc | Grand Island, NE 68803 | $170,670 |
63 | Larry Woitaszewski | Wood River, NE 68883 | $170,403 |
64 | Allan Farms Inc | Wood River, NE 68883 | $170,359 |
65 | Circle L Land & Cattle | Doniphan, NE 68832 | $168,568 |
66 | Gary Harders | Wood River, NE 68883 | $168,096 |
67 | D P Davis Farms Inc | Wood River, NE 68883 | $165,629 |
68 | T & E Cattle Co | Grand Island, NE 68803 | $162,260 |
69 | Rick Stelk | Alda, NE 68810 | $162,086 |
70 | Roland Engel | Wood River, NE 68883 | $161,158 |
71 | Rohrich Farms Inc | Wood River, NE 68883 | $158,024 |
72 | Alfred F And Mary Carol Turek Rev Trust | Wood River, NE 68883 | $157,697 |
73 | Kyle R Koepp | Wood River, NE 68883 | $156,540 |
74 | H2 Farms Inc | Doniphan, NE 68832 | $156,536 |
75 | Leslie Stelk | Grand Island, NE 68803 | $155,255 |
76 | Brabander Farms Inc | Grand Island, NE 68803 | $154,580 |
77 | Huxtable Farms LLC | Wood River, NE 68883 | $153,183 |
78 | David L Spiehs | Wood River, NE 68883 | $153,182 |
79 | B & D General Partnership | Grand Island, NE 68803 | $153,041 |
80 | Five-b Corporation | Grand Island, NE 68803 | $152,005 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”