Deficiency Payment in Hall County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,269
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Hall County, Nebraska totaled $6,634,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Raymond Engel | Wood River, NE 68883 | $15,828 |
122 | Duane Rieflin | Doniphan, NE 68832 | $15,794 |
123 | Rex Allen Spiehs | Wood River, NE 68883 | $15,774 |
124 | Jim Rathman | Grand Island, NE 68803 | $15,697 |
125 | Charles D Mctavish | Wood River, NE 68883 | $15,667 |
126 | Rickert Farms Inc | Wood River, NE 68883 | $15,644 |
127 | Midland Ag Service | Grand Island, NE 68801 | $15,563 |
128 | Douglas D Lewis | Wood River, NE 68883 | $15,481 |
129 | Kevin Kenyon | Grand Island, NE 68803 | $15,420 |
130 | Wayne Rennau | Wood River, NE 68883 | $15,293 |
131 | Rohrich Farms Inc | Wood River, NE 68883 | $15,283 |
132 | Neal Sahling | Prosser, NE 68883 | $15,168 |
133 | Mitchell Meier | Doniphan, NE 68832 | $15,097 |
134 | Dennis Nelson | Doniphan, NE 68832 | $15,083 |
135 | Martin Hargens | Cairo, NE 68824 | $14,895 |
136 | Dave Ogden Farms Inc | Wood River, NE 68883 | $14,864 |
137 | James Ripp | Wood River, NE 68883 | $14,808 |
138 | Alfred F And Mary Carol Turek Rev Trust | Wood River, NE 68883 | $14,807 |
139 | John Webster | Wood River, NE 68883 | $14,769 |
140 | James R Turek | Wood River, NE 68883 | $14,646 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”