Farm Subsidy information
Hall County, Nebraska
Total Subsidies in Hall County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 3,064
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Hall County, Nebraska totaled $442,496,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Gloe Farms Inc | Wood River, NE 68883 | $1,276,395 |
42 | Donald Franklin Moss | Grand Island, NE 68803 | $1,226,446 |
43 | Denman Farms Part | Alda, NE 68810 | $1,171,821 |
44 | Allan Farms Inc | Wood River, NE 68883 | $1,170,447 |
45 | David L Spiehs | Wood River, NE 68883 | $1,164,449 |
46 | Miller Brothers | Wood River, NE 68883 | $1,146,994 |
47 | Kevin Rainforth | Doniphan, NE 68832 | $1,142,133 |
48 | Diamond-j Farms Inc | Doniphan, NE 68832 | $1,134,796 |
49 | Robert M Panowicz | Cairo, NE 68824 | $1,128,301 |
50 | Kevken Farms Inc | Grand Island, NE 68803 | $1,124,691 |
51 | Max Mader | Grand Island, NE 68803 | $1,123,028 |
52 | Duane Rieflin | Doniphan, NE 68832 | $1,113,395 |
53 | Cropland Farms Inc | Doniphan, NE 68832 | $1,106,387 |
54 | Double H Partnership | Doniphan, NE 68832 | $1,102,204 |
55 | Rickert Farms Inc | Wood River, NE 68883 | $1,100,379 |
56 | Rohrich Farms Inc | Wood River, NE 68883 | $1,099,331 |
57 | Kyle R Koepp | Wood River, NE 68883 | $1,097,851 |
58 | Larry Woitaszewski | Wood River, NE 68883 | $1,088,674 |
59 | A & A Farms | Wood River, NE 68883 | $1,086,204 |
60 | Martin Hargens | Cairo, NE 68824 | $1,083,465 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”