Farm Subsidy information
Hall County, Nebraska
Total Subsidies in Hall County, Nebraska, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 692
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Hall County, Nebraska totaled $14,469,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ken And Debra Woitaszewski's Corporation | Wood River, NE 68883 | $216,894 |
2 | Myers & Sons Livestock And Land Company | Cairo, NE 68824 | $142,686 |
3 | Jeh Farms Inc | Giltner, NE 68841 | $139,637 |
4 | Brian M Harrenstein | Doniphan, NE 68832 | $131,263 |
5 | M & L Poehler Farms Inc | Shelton, NE 68876 | $122,642 |
6 | Rader Farms Inc | Trumbull, NE 68980 | $111,168 |
7 | Kyle R Koepp | Wood River, NE 68883 | $105,163 |
8 | Michael W Lowry | Cairo, NE 68824 | $105,075 |
9 | Willoughby Farms Inc | Wood River, NE 68883 | $104,575 |
10 | A & A Farms | Wood River, NE 68883 | $102,443 |
11 | D & K Woodman | Kenesaw, NE 68956 | $102,356 |
12 | Double H Partnership | Doniphan, NE 68832 | $100,872 |
13 | Ron And Kathy Woitaszewski Inc | Wood River, NE 68883 | $96,756 |
14 | Rohrich Farms Inc And Debra L Rohrich Jt Vt | Wood River, NE 68883 | $96,583 |
15 | Mettenbrink Farms | Grand Island, NE 68803 | $92,293 |
16 | Hostetler Brothers | Cairo, NE 68824 | $89,597 |
17 | Ry-max Farms Inc | Wood River, NE 68883 | $87,513 |
18 | David L Spiehs | Wood River, NE 68883 | $86,137 |
19 | Rohrich Farms Inc | Wood River, NE 68883 | $83,229 |
20 | Brad Kroeger | Doniphan, NE 68832 | $80,980 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>