Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Harlan County, Nebraska, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 201
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Harlan County, Nebraska totaled $192,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Gail E Tubbs | Long Island, KS 67647 | $210 |
122 | Ben Nech | Long Island, KS 67647 | $207 |
123 | Sappa Creek Farms L L C | Orleans, NE 68966 | $204 |
124 | Larry Beahm- Larry And Tania Beahm Trust Dated The | Alma, NE 68920 | $204 |
125 | Steven Allen Haussermann | Franklin, NE 68939 | $203 |
126 | James Leroy Haussermann | Bloomington, NE 68929 | $203 |
127 | Robin D Hinrichs Rev Trust | Axtell, NE 68924 | $202 |
128 | Jodi R Hinrichs Rev Trust | Axtell, NE 68924 | $202 |
129 | Flodine Farms L L C | Omaha, NE 68154 | $190 |
130 | Massey Family Limited Liability Limited Partnershi | Mandan, ND 58554 | $182 |
131 | Dwight Waldo | Republican City, NE 68971 | $181 |
132 | , | $171 | |
133 | Kent Thalheim | Long Island, KS 67647 | $166 |
134 | Dewey Knuth | Oxford, NE 68967 | $165 |
135 | Chelsey S Dallmann | Upland, NE 68981 | $165 |
136 | Stoelting Farms | Alma, NE 68920 | $163 |
137 | Verlyn Thalheim Trust 1 | Long Island, KS 67647 | $162 |
138 | David S Wilson | Ellis, KS 67637 | $154 |
139 | Laquita D Smith | Almena, KS 67622 | $153 |
140 | Howard L Schuerman | Alma, NE 68920 | $150 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”