Counter Cyclical Program in Holt County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 950
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Holt County, Nebraska totaled $16,071,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Dowd Oil Co Inc | Columbus, NE 68602 | $51,248 |
82 | Duane Joseph Dowd | Columbus, NE 68602 | $51,201 |
83 | Constance Eileen Dowd-molvig | Columbus, NE 68602 | $51,201 |
84 | Lawrence William Dowd | Columbus, NE 68602 | $51,201 |
85 | Deanna Marie Dowd | Columbus, NE 68602 | $51,201 |
86 | Eileen P Dowd Trust | Columbus, NE 68602 | $51,201 |
87 | Colleen Marian Hall | Columbus, NE 68602 | $51,201 |
88 | Michael Leo Dowd | Columbus, NE 68602 | $51,201 |
89 | Noreen Ann Shaughnessy | Columbus, NE 68602 | $51,201 |
90 | Cathy W Vonseggern | Santa Rosa, CA 95403 | $50,673 |
91 | Marvin R Soucek | Verdigre, NE 68783 | $49,976 |
92 | Ronald C Crumly | Page, NE 68766 | $49,586 |
93 | Jeanne Marie Crumly | Page, NE 68766 | $49,586 |
94 | Steve Thompson | Oneill, NE 68763 | $48,801 |
95 | Wyn David Johnson | Oneill, NE 68763 | $48,260 |
96 | Roger Frickel | Atkinson, NE 68713 | $47,290 |
97 | Ryan G Walters | Chambers, NE 68725 | $46,625 |
98 | Salsness Ranch Inc | Sioux City, IA 51102 | $46,450 |
99 | Kevin Richard Kurpgeweit | Ewing, NE 68735 | $46,231 |
100 | Jerald J Winkler | Atkinson, NE 68713 | $45,688 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”