Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Howard County, Nebraska, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 489
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Howard County, Nebraska totaled $3,927,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Donald D Jensen Living Revo Trust | Saint Paul, NE 68873 | $29,135 |
22 | Diamond Y Ranch LLC | Wolbach, NE 68882 | $29,009 |
23 | Mamot Land & Cattle Company Inc | Saint Libory, NE 68872 | $28,649 |
24 | Errol Wells | Elba, NE 68835 | $28,428 |
25 | Anderson Hog Farm Inc | Saint Paul, NE 68873 | $28,138 |
26 | T-j Wegner Farms | Chapman, NE 68827 | $28,005 |
27 | Nowak Farms, LLC | Saint Paul, NE 68873 | $27,969 |
28 | Robin Irvine | Ravenna, NE 68869 | $27,810 |
29 | Sun Valley Farms Inc. | Cotesfield, NE 68835 | $27,689 |
30 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $26,883 |
31 | Travis Dean Fagan | Dannebrog, NE 68831 | $26,631 |
32 | Jerald L Placke | Saint Libory, NE 68872 | $25,940 |
33 | Robert Allan Ksionzek | Ashton, NE 68817 | $25,932 |
34 | Wells Brothers | Elba, NE 68835 | $24,811 |
35 | Russell Dean Schwenk | Saint Libory, NE 68872 | $24,746 |
36 | Wade Kroeger | Dannebrog, NE 68831 | $24,720 |
37 | Dennis Michael Adams | Dannebrog, NE 68831 | $24,537 |
38 | Marvin Lee Poss | Elba, NE 68835 | $24,087 |
39 | Daniel Thomas Stanczyk | Ashton, NE 68817 | $24,030 |
40 | Dean Gail Thede | Saint Paul, NE 68873 | $23,785 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”