Total Conservation Programs in Howard County, Nebraska, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 80
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Howard County, Nebraska totaled $331,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Gary Ambrose | Palmer, NE 68864 | $5,654 |
22 | Ellen I Paulsen Trust | Grand Island, NE 68803 | $5,468 |
23 | Donald Eugene Lewandowski | Ashton, NE 68817 | $5,389 |
24 | Pineview LLC | Grand Island, NE 68803 | $4,888 |
25 | Rose M Ross | Saint Paul, NE 68873 | $4,442 |
26 | Rubesh Family Irrevocable Trust | Wahoo, NE 68066 | $3,984 |
27 | Gary F Justesen | Brookings, SD 57006 | $3,892 |
28 | Robert Kemper | St Libory, NE 68872 | $3,621 |
29 | Clara Ann Wieck | Saint Libory, NE 68872 | $3,578 |
30 | Keith M Brus | Wolbach, NE 68882 | $3,504 |
31 | Greg J Ambrose | Saint Paul, NE 68873 | $3,463 |
32 | Lawrence Wojtalewicz | Grand Island, NE 68801 | $3,246 |
33 | Jeanne E Bruntz | St Paul, NE 68873 | $3,238 |
34 | Ellen L Goerl Administrative Trus | Saint Paul, NE 68873 | $3,222 |
35 | John E Oeltjen | Palmer, NE 68864 | $3,203 |
36 | Larry Teichmeier | Cairo, NE 68824 | $3,137 |
37 | Nathan Allen Brabec | Wood River, NE 68883 | $3,098 |
38 | Archie Ambrose | Saint Libory, NE 68872 | $2,612 |
39 | Anderson Hog Farm Inc | Saint Paul, NE 68873 | $2,599 |
40 | Jim Forbes | Palmer, NE 68864 | $2,599 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”