Counter Cyclical Program in Howard County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 889
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Howard County, Nebraska totaled $8,009,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Gary G Bader Trust | Palmer, NE 68864 | $33,365 |
62 | Russell George Sack | Saint Paul, NE 68873 | $33,261 |
63 | Theodore Lee Kohtz | Boelus, NE 68820 | $33,215 |
64 | John M Mcelroy | Dannebrog, NE 68831 | $32,711 |
65 | Gerald George Sack | Saint Paul, NE 68873 | $32,696 |
66 | Cording Cattle Co | Saint Paul, NE 68873 | $32,629 |
67 | Dennis Michael Adams | Dannebrog, NE 68831 | $32,552 |
68 | Norman Wissing | Saint Libory, NE 68872 | $32,406 |
69 | Bruce Rathman | Farwell, NE 68838 | $32,346 |
70 | K & S Farms Living Trust | Farwell, NE 68838 | $32,321 |
71 | A & J Farms | Saint Paul, NE 68873 | $32,107 |
72 | Four Star Farms Inc | Saint Paul, NE 68873 | $31,936 |
73 | Gerald Rathman | Farwell, NE 68838 | $31,054 |
74 | Bradley Rathman | Farwell, NE 68838 | $31,045 |
75 | Richard R Bierbaum | Saint Libory, NE 68872 | $30,581 |
76 | Ronald Gorecki | Dannebrog, NE 68831 | $30,262 |
77 | Daryl L Anderson | Saint Paul, NE 68873 | $29,467 |
78 | Anton Thomas Stefanowicz Jr | Grand Island, NE 68803 | $28,976 |
79 | Kenneth K Lauritsen | Dannebrog, NE 68831 | $28,965 |
80 | William Frank Sack | Saint Paul, NE 68873 | $28,913 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”