Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) in Howard County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 20
Recipients of Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) from farms in Howard County, Nebraska totaled $140,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Amazing Grains Farm | Palmer, NE 68864 | $23,750 |
2 | Gary A Meyer | Palmer, NE 68864 | $11,875 |
3 | Kirk Bader | Palmer, NE 68864 | $11,875 |
4 | Connyce F Bader | Palmer, NE 68864 | $11,875 |
5 | James R Fanta | Dannebrog, NE 68831 | $11,875 |
6 | Dustin J Dugan | Saint Paul, NE 68873 | $11,875 |
7 | Jared A Rasmussen | Saint Paul, NE 68873 | $11,875 |
8 | Gary Lee Hamilton | Elba, NE 68835 | $9,286 |
9 | Bradley D Bushhousen | Palmer, NE 68864 | $7,854 |
10 | Nathan B Christensen | Boelus, NE 68820 | $7,089 |
11 | Sack Brothers And Son Cattle Company LLC | Saint Paul, NE 68873 | $4,773 |
12 | Karen A Spotanski | Ashton, NE 68817 | $4,082 |
13 | Timothy L Usasz | Saint Paul, NE 68873 | $3,057 |
14 | Tom Gorecki | Scotia, NE 68875 | $2,210 |
15 | Michael James Curlo | Ashton, NE 68817 | $2,045 |
16 | Tim R Wells | Elba, NE 68835 | $1,645 |
17 | M3 Hay And Cattle, LLC | Wood River, NE 68883 | $1,450 |
18 | Nicholas L Glause | Saint Libory, NE 68872 | $718 |
19 | Ronald Glause | Saint Libory, NE 68872 | $406 |
20 | David Koperski | Saint Paul, NE 68873 | $269 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>