Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Keith County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 133
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Keith County, Nebraska totaled $2,996,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Rick Moser | Onawa, IA 51040 | $11,813 |
62 | Arden Krugerud | Mc Cook, NE 69001 | $11,280 |
63 | Roger Draucker | Keystone, NE 69144 | $11,220 |
64 | F & K Investment Company | Mc Cook, NE 69001 | $11,176 |
65 | Patrick Ensz | Paxton, NE 69155 | $10,693 |
66 | Larry Beckler | Seward, NE 68434 | $10,670 |
67 | Randall Ensz | Paxton, NE 69155 | $9,057 |
68 | Wade Brandon Hill | Ogallala, NE 69153 | $8,974 |
69 | Clifford & Adeline Mcbride Revoca | Brule, NE 69127 | $8,767 |
70 | Ann Kathleen Smith | Fort Collins, CO 80526 | $8,355 |
71 | Michael Armstrong | Paxton, NE 69155 | $8,126 |
72 | Megan L Jehorek | Ogallala, NE 69153 | $7,304 |
73 | Dean E Krajewski | Ogallala, NE 69153 | $6,889 |
74 | Michael Rosentrater | Paxton, NE 69155 | $6,857 |
75 | Donald R Apolius | Ogallala, NE 69153 | $6,595 |
76 | Ruth L Beckler | Seward, NE 68434 | $6,412 |
77 | Randall T Perlinger | Sutherland, NE 69165 | $6,121 |
78 | Renn Enterprises Lp | Ogallala, NE 69153 | $5,880 |
79 | Hoover Farms Inc | Brule, NE 69127 | $5,630 |
80 | Martin Flaming | Ogallala, NE 69153 | $5,564 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”