Emergency Conservation Program in Keith County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 106
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Keith County, Nebraska totaled $418,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Ray Herbel Revocable Trust | Scottsbluff, NE 69361 | $1,101 |
82 | Randall Meyer | Madrid, NE 69150 | $983 |
83 | Troy L Reese | Grant, NE 69140 | $895 |
84 | Breen Family LLC | North Platte, NE 69101 | $890 |
85 | Hahn Farms Inc | Paxton, NE 69155 | $872 |
86 | Delbert Mc Keag | Ogallala, NE 69153 | $864 |
87 | Dale Meyer | Denver, CO 80260 | $784 |
88 | Edwin H Hahn | Wallace, NE 69169 | $761 |
89 | Brown Family Trust | Dana Point, CA 92629 | $760 |
90 | Anita Biel Family Trust | Ogallala, NE 69153 | $710 |
91 | Lucille J Sedlacek Estate | Boulder, CO 80305 | $691 |
92 | Leonard D Johnson Living Trust | Ogallala, NE 69153 | $659 |
93 | Jo Anne Harms | Brule, NE 69127 | $563 |
94 | Phylis E Graney | Sundance, WY 82729 | $557 |
95 | Contryman Farm Partnership | Rapid City, SD 57702 | $557 |
96 | Gerald L Geisert | Ogallala, NE 69153 | $528 |
97 | Larry Kracman | North Platte, NE 69101 | $518 |
98 | Tom Hansmeier | Ogallala, NE 69153 | $511 |
99 | Jeffery J Meyer | Ogallala, NE 69153 | $490 |
100 | Martin D Meyer | Ogallala, NE 69153 | $490 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”