Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Kimball County, Nebraska, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 75
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Kimball County, Nebraska totaled $834,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Chelsea Sue Mossberg | Harrisburg, NE 69345 | $5,882 |
42 | Phil Corman | Bridgeport, NE 69336 | $5,853 |
43 | Rose Miller | Bushnell, NE 69128 | $5,243 |
44 | David Miller | Bushnell, NE 69128 | $5,235 |
45 | Lanelle Martin | Kimball, NE 69145 | $5,145 |
46 | Shaw Land And Cattle LLC | Kimball, NE 69145 | $4,968 |
47 | Lawrence G Engstrom | Kimball, NE 69145 | $4,817 |
48 | Justin W Corman | Bridgeport, NE 69336 | $4,707 |
49 | Nicholas Mahr | Sidney, NE 69162 | $4,541 |
50 | Josh Stauffer | Harrisburg, NE 69345 | $4,470 |
51 | Donna M Mcgowan | Harrisburg, NE 69345 | $3,833 |
52 | Engstrom Farms Inc | Kimball, NE 69145 | $3,467 |
53 | Brady Cross | Harrisburg, NE 69345 | $3,248 |
54 | , | $3,248 | |
55 | Vaughn Lukassen | Kimball, NE 69145 | $2,674 |
56 | Hilary Cook | Kimball, NE 69145 | $2,622 |
57 | Linda Barrett | Kimball, NE 69145 | $2,603 |
58 | Dan Barrett | Kimball, NE 69145 | $2,603 |
59 | Colt Morgan Alexander | Potter, NE 69156 | $2,410 |
60 | Sebastian Eduardo Portillo | Kimball, NE 69145 | $2,248 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”