Total Conservation Programs in Madison County, Nebraska, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 178
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Madison County, Nebraska totaled $1,337,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Glenn W Ternus | Madison, NE 68748 | $2,818 |
102 | Thomas A Becker | Madison, NE 68748 | $2,772 |
103 | Brent A Wietfeld | Leigh, NE 68643 | $2,733 |
104 | Terry Westbrook | Norfolk, NE 68701 | $2,706 |
105 | James Brockhaus | Humphrey, NE 68642 | $2,685 |
106 | Todd Pospisil | Norfolk, NE 68701 | $2,685 |
107 | Cdm Farms LLC | Norfolk, NE 68701 | $2,649 |
108 | Dan Denkinger | Battle Creek, NE 68715 | $2,622 |
109 | R & H Investments L L C | Meadow Grove, NE 68752 | $2,620 |
110 | Deuel Family Farms LLC | Norfolk, NE 68701 | $2,610 |
111 | Allen Wedekind | Madison, NE 68748 | $2,561 |
112 | , | $2,518 | |
113 | John R Schroeder And Becky S Schroeder Family Trus | Battle Creek, NE 68715 | $2,514 |
114 | Credit Shelter Trust Of The John R Schroeder And B | Battle Creek, NE 68715 | $2,514 |
115 | Lucas Bennett | Meadow Grove, NE 68752 | $2,479 |
116 | Larry Wayne Tegeler | Meadow Grove, NE 68752 | $2,442 |
117 | Gary Murphy | Norfolk, NE 68701 | $2,364 |
118 | Richard W Johnson | Tilden, NE 68781 | $2,344 |
119 | Dale Finkral | Battle Creek, NE 68715 | $2,285 |
120 | Eldon Peters | Norfolk, NE 68701 | $2,282 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”