Farm Subsidy information
Merrick County, Nebraska
Total Subsidies in Merrick County, Nebraska, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 302
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Merrick County, Nebraska totaled $7,972,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | , | $12,846 | |
62 | Elijah S Kershaw | Silver Creek, NE 68663 | $12,621 |
63 | Daniel R Baker | Silver Creek, NE 68663 | $12,556 |
64 | Casey E Beck | Central City, NE 68826 | $12,486 |
65 | H & E Farms Gp | Palmer, NE 68864 | $12,453 |
66 | Blessed Sacrament Catholic Church | Lincoln, NE 68528 | $12,182 |
67 | Travis R. Kuhn | Clarks, NE 68628 | $11,806 |
68 | , | $11,558 | |
69 | Roxanne Brandes Revocable Inter V | Central City, NE 68826 | $11,555 |
70 | Benjamin C Friedrichsen | Palmer, NE 68864 | $11,542 |
71 | Ferris Ag Inc | Central City, NE 68826 | $11,328 |
72 | Stebec Farms Inc | Chapman, NE 68827 | $11,315 |
73 | Benjamin F Peters | Saint Libory, NE 68872 | $11,245 |
74 | Edward Mcneff | Archer, NE 68816 | $11,149 |
75 | Samuel D Krug | Chapman, NE 68827 | $10,875 |
76 | Spear Ag Inc | Central City, NE 68826 | $10,741 |
77 | Nathan H Doggett | Palmer, NE 68864 | $10,535 |
78 | Russell J Eilers | Palmer, NE 68864 | $10,511 |
79 | Pauline Kirby Revoc Trust | Carmel Valley, CA 93924 | $10,422 |
80 | Jason Lee Hanke | Archer, NE 68816 | $10,400 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”