Production Flexibility Program in Merrick County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,341
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Merrick County, Nebraska totaled $39,503,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Thomas J Beck | Clarks, NE 68628 | $132,806 |
62 | Michael Scott Thede | Palmer, NE 68864 | $129,996 |
63 | Gerald Dittmer | Clarks, NE 68628 | $129,690 |
64 | Roger L Johnson | Central City, NE 68826 | $129,659 |
65 | Richard D Friedrichsen | Clarks, NE 68628 | $128,413 |
66 | Robert Fuelberth | Central City, NE 68826 | $127,062 |
67 | Vernon Svitak | Chapman, NE 68827 | $125,069 |
68 | Robyn Seim | Chapman, NE 68827 | $124,870 |
69 | Michael Reeves | Central City, NE 68826 | $121,936 |
70 | Richard Dubas | Clarks, NE 68628 | $120,732 |
71 | Orville Blauhorn | Palmer, NE 68864 | $120,270 |
72 | Evangeline Mary Svitak | Chapman, NE 68827 | $120,167 |
73 | Harry C Preisendorf | Grand Island, NE 68803 | $119,563 |
74 | Larry Schwarz | Archer, NE 68816 | $118,814 |
75 | Palm Ag Inc | Central City, NE 68826 | $118,558 |
76 | Ronald Grigsby | Central City, NE 68826 | $115,342 |
77 | Rexford Weller | Central City, NE 68826 | $114,913 |
78 | James L Evers | Fullerton, NE 68638 | $114,804 |
79 | Benner Hardwood Floors And Farms | Central City, NE 68826 | $114,618 |
80 | Platte View Land & Cattle | Central City, NE 68826 | $114,255 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”