Farm Subsidy information
Nemaha County, Nebraska
Total Subsidies in Nemaha County, Nebraska, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 704
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Nemaha County, Nebraska totaled $18,726,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rst Farms Inc | Auburn, NE 68305 | $292,194 |
| 2 | Thomas Lee Snodgrass | Brock, NE 68320 | $270,293 |
| 3 | Brandon Snodgrass | Brock, NE 68320 | $237,539 |
| 4 | Richard E Andrew | Auburn, NE 68305 | $204,255 |
| 5 | Richard M Alden II | Auburn, NE 68305 | $204,077 |
| 6 | James Gerdes | Auburn, NE 68305 | $199,213 |
| 7 | Louis D Stukenholtz | Peru, NE 68421 | $192,854 |
| 8 | Luke Denton Andrew | Nemaha, NE 68414 | $188,663 |
| 9 | Bea Farms LLC | Brock, NE 68320 | $178,493 |
| 10 | Nicholas Snodgrass | Brock, NE 68320 | $162,941 |
| 11 | Myron Gerdes | Auburn, NE 68305 | $159,466 |
| 12 | Riverland Ag Inc | Auburn, NE 68305 | $157,905 |
| 13 | Stanley And Virginia Allen Trust | Omaha, NE 68154 | $156,828 |
| 14 | Bryce Eugene Andrew | Auburn, NE 68305 | $156,332 |
| 15 | Cjg Farms Limited Partnership | Nebraska City, NE 68410 | $156,078 |
| 16 | Kelly J Rippe | Syracuse, NE 68446 | $154,024 |
| 17 | Alan Rippe | Syracuse, NE 68446 | $153,578 |
| 18 | Arlin Aufenkamp | Brownville, NE 68321 | $151,942 |
| 19 | Diane Aufenkamp | Brownville, NE 68321 | $151,887 |
| 20 | Gobber Farms Partnership | Humboldt, NE 68376 | $148,980 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf