Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Otoe County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 990
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Otoe County, Nebraska totaled $14,172,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Bartling Brothers Inc | Unadilla, NE 68454 | $750,000 |
2 | Action Pig Co | Talmage, NE 68448 | $210,749 |
3 | Moss Farms Inc | Burr, NE 68324 | $175,481 |
4 | James Properties LLC | Nebraska City, NE 68410 | $150,852 |
5 | Mcginnis Family Farms LLC | Nebraska City, NE 68410 | $129,481 |
6 | Meyer Bros Inc | Nebraska City, NE 68410 | $124,748 |
7 | Neels Livestock Inc | Dunbar, NE 68346 | $123,916 |
8 | Brad Kuehn | Dunbar, NE 68346 | $123,193 |
9 | D&d Damme Farms Inc | Talmage, NE 68448 | $119,619 |
10 | Ls Damme Farms Inc | Syracuse, NE 68446 | $119,595 |
11 | Steven L Dean | Sterling, NE 68443 | $118,136 |
12 | Gregory D Stukenholtz | Nebraska City, NE 68410 | $111,435 |
13 | James M Buel | Eagle, NE 68347 | $107,416 |
14 | C And M Spf Farms Inc | Nebraska City, NE 68410 | $102,980 |
15 | Pietzyk Farms Inc | Burr, NE 68324 | $95,512 |
16 | Deroe Farms LLC | Douglas, NE 68344 | $88,411 |
17 | Michael L Heng | Nebraska City, NE 68410 | $84,754 |
18 | Doug Damme Farms Inc | Talmage, NE 68448 | $84,577 |
19 | Rodney Ruhge | Avoca, NE 68307 | $82,877 |
20 | Chad William Lutjemeyer | Otoe, NE 68417 | $82,355 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>