Counter Cyclical Program in Otoe County, Nebraska, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,593
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Otoe County, Nebraska totaled $6,822,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Patrick Gress | Nebraska City, NE 68410 | $32,070 |
22 | Brad Kuehn | Dunbar, NE 68346 | $31,835 |
23 | Neels Farms Inc | Dunbar, NE 68346 | $30,539 |
24 | Boyne K Hallowell | Palmyra, NE 68418 | $30,229 |
25 | Meyer Bros Inc | Nebraska City, NE 68410 | $29,573 |
26 | Thomas Lee Snodgrass | Brock, NE 68320 | $29,570 |
27 | Wellman Farms Inc | Syracuse, NE 68446 | $29,304 |
28 | Wirth Farms Inc | Nebraska City, NE 68410 | $28,960 |
29 | Stanley A Emshoff Living Trust | Avoca, NE 68307 | $28,190 |
30 | James Buchholz | Otoe, NE 68417 | $27,873 |
31 | Dennis P Kreifels Revocable Trust | Syracuse, NE 68446 | $27,652 |
32 | Craig A Schroeder | Talmage, NE 68448 | $27,609 |
33 | Doyle L Schroeder | Talmage, NE 68448 | $27,609 |
34 | Harvey F Vogt | Unadilla, NE 68454 | $26,816 |
35 | Moss Farms Inc | Burr, NE 68324 | $26,769 |
36 | Wayne Meyer | Avoca, NE 68307 | $26,369 |
37 | James M Buel | Eagle, NE 68347 | $26,253 |
38 | Gregory Scott Ramold | Nebraska City, NE 68410 | $26,185 |
39 | Doug Damme Farms Inc | Talmage, NE 68448 | $25,739 |
40 | Kenneth J Hartman Revocable Trust | Douglas, NE 68344 | $25,217 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”