Total Commodity Programs in Red Willow County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,289
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Red Willow County, Nebraska totaled $223,517,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | L & M Farms General Partnership | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $1,156,040 |
22 | Randy Peters Seed Farms Inc | Mc Cook, NE 69001 | $1,128,844 |
23 | Kirk Messinger Inc | Mc Cook, NE 69001 | $1,100,844 |
24 | Buffalo Creek Farms Inc | Indianola, NE 69034 | $1,080,635 |
25 | Clifford Randel | Indianola, NE 69034 | $1,046,090 |
26 | Haag Land And Cattle Co | Bartley, NE 69020 | $1,042,357 |
27 | Jack E Ryan | Indianola, NE 69034 | $1,039,547 |
28 | Messinger Lands Inc | Mc Cook, NE 69001 | $1,036,641 |
29 | Perry Quigley | Indianola, NE 69034 | $1,022,448 |
30 | Les Schmidt Revocable Trust | Indianola, NE 69034 | $994,267 |
31 | Rams Horn Dairy LLC | Yuma, CO 80759 | $974,581 |
32 | Jay A Schilling | Mc Cook, NE 69001 | $960,215 |
33 | Warren E Schaffert | Trenton, NE 69044 | $957,534 |
34 | Lavonne Hanchera | Danbury, NE 69026 | $953,320 |
35 | Delaine James Soucie | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $943,664 |
36 | Dewayne Hanchera | Danbury, NE 69026 | $942,006 |
37 | Thomas E Smith | Bartley, NE 69020 | $937,066 |
38 | Douglas S Liess | Indianola, NE 69034 | $936,805 |
39 | Michael T Baker | Trenton, NE 69044 | $936,273 |
40 | Merrit Arthur Nelms | Indianola, NE 69034 | $928,165 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”