Total Conservation Programs in Richardson County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,535
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Richardson County, Nebraska totaled $75,327,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Huppert Partnership | Salem, NE 68433 | $915,999 |
2 | Stalder Cattle Co | Salem, NE 68433 | $897,829 |
3 | Roy C Wittwer Jr | Sabetha, KS 66534 | $888,105 |
4 | Richard L Guilliams Trust | Falls City, NE 68355 | $804,879 |
5 | Iowa Tribe Of Kansas And Nebraska | White Cloud, KS 66094 | $767,359 |
6 | L A H Eickhoff Farms Inc | Falls City, NE 68355 | $762,306 |
7 | Gkg Farms Partnership | Omaha, NE 68132 | $757,570 |
8 | Dan C Wittwer | Dawson, NE 68337 | $732,136 |
9 | Marcasa LLC | Sycamore, IL 60178 | $681,205 |
10 | Reesman Investment Corp | Hiawatha, KS 66434 | $679,493 |
11 | Robert L Georges | Falls City, NE 68355 | $652,748 |
12 | Betty J Blecha Trust | Lincoln, NE 68505 | $638,140 |
13 | Melvin R Streit | Du Bois, NE 68345 | $598,283 |
14 | Michael L Garriott | Falls City, NE 68355 | $587,848 |
15 | Sherburne Farms LLC | Papillion, NE 68046 | $553,510 |
16 | Duaine L Shaffer | Oklahoma City, OK 73135 | $543,952 |
17 | Patrick L Mcinteer | Falls City, NE 68355 | $542,209 |
18 | Edwin J Nutzman | Falls City, NE 68355 | $536,436 |
19 | Adams Mellicent S Revocable Trust | Salem, NE 68433 | $514,726 |
20 | Paul Burgett | Humboldt, NE 68376 | $510,326 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>