Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Richardson County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 108
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Richardson County, Nebraska totaled $167,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Fern Schawang | Falls City, NE 68355 | $2,131 |
22 | R L Neman | Ada, OK 74820 | $1,997 |
23 | Tom Georges | Shubert, NE 68437 | $1,957 |
24 | Thomas G Bradish Jr | Denham Springs, LA 70726 | $1,950 |
25 | Steven Frederick | Falls City, NE 68355 | $1,572 |
26 | David Leon Frederick | Falls City, NE 68355 | $1,571 |
27 | Caroline Merz Revoc Living Trust | Las Vegas, NV 89135 | $1,530 |
28 | Dolores V Palermo | Missouri City, TX 77489 | $1,487 |
29 | Clara B Constantine Decd | Falls City, NE 68355 | $1,440 |
30 | Randall Mark Sickel | Falls City, NE 68355 | $1,439 |
31 | Dennis L & Linda J Bauman Trust | Falls City, NE 68355 | $1,383 |
32 | Helen Thiltges | Falls City, NE 68355 | $1,351 |
33 | Robert Beckett Sr | Stella, NE 68442 | $1,344 |
34 | Dora F Deckinger Decd | Falls City, NE 68355 | $1,297 |
35 | Louis W Deroin | Verdon, NE 68457 | $1,266 |
36 | C Duane Eickhoff | Falls City, NE 68355 | $1,228 |
37 | Bpl Properties | Logan, UT 84321 | $1,205 |
38 | Dale Duerfeldt | Falls City, NE 68355 | $1,200 |
39 | William Knobbe | Shubert, NE 68437 | $1,143 |
40 | Garland Kuker | Shubert, NE 68437 | $1,109 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”