Emergency Conservation Program in Richardson County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 111
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Richardson County, Nebraska totaled $564,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Marvin Duerfeldt | Falls City, NE 68355 | $6,183 |
22 | Portia A Voelker Revoc Trust | Nebraska City, NE 68410 | $6,140 |
23 | Roesch Farms Ltd | Falls City, NE 68355 | $5,650 |
24 | Snethen & Sons Heritage Farms Inc | Humboldt, NE 68376 | $5,463 |
25 | James E Frederick | Falls City, NE 68355 | $5,140 |
26 | Hutchings Family Trust | Falls City, NE 68355 | $5,030 |
27 | Vera Ploeger | Falls City, NE 68355 | $5,020 |
28 | Go Reo LLC | Seward, NE 68434 | $4,410 |
29 | Zoeller Farms Inc | Falls City, NE 68355 | $3,707 |
30 | Stephen J & Cheryl A Schawang Tru | Falls City, NE 68355 | $3,556 |
31 | Lewis Zentner | Falls City, NE 68355 | $3,438 |
32 | Brenda Steinhauser | Grand Island, NE 68801 | $3,300 |
33 | Kevin D Glathar | Beaverdam, VA 23015 | $3,300 |
34 | Carico Farms Inc | Falls City, NE 68355 | $3,007 |
35 | Douglas Portrey | Lancaster, PA 17602 | $2,647 |
36 | Jessie Humm | Palmyra, NE 68418 | $2,540 |
37 | Michael R Finck | Falls City, NE 68355 | $2,311 |
38 | Gary Richey | Falls City, NE 68355 | $2,250 |
39 | Reschke Revocable Trust | Lawrence, KS 66047 | $2,223 |
40 | Daniel Edward Strong-daniel E Strong Trust | Gardner, KS 66030 | $2,220 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”