Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Richardson County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 681
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Richardson County, Nebraska totaled $22,772,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Dan C Wittwer | Dawson, NE 68337 | $130,266 |
42 | Gerald B Scholl | Falls City, NE 68355 | $129,523 |
43 | Thomas A Niedfeldt | Falls City, NE 68355 | $127,585 |
44 | Russell Heineman | Falls City, NE 68355 | $126,603 |
45 | Rick E Nutzman | Falls City, NE 68355 | $126,248 |
46 | Kent Knobbe | Falls City, NE 68355 | $125,817 |
47 | David Knobbe | Falls City, NE 68355 | $125,817 |
48 | Bauman Family Limited Partnership | Falls City, NE 68355 | $125,000 |
49 | Cedar Farms Inc | Falls City, NE 68355 | $124,806 |
50 | Kevin E Taft | Falls City, NE 68355 | $124,329 |
51 | Keithley Brothers Inc | Verdon, NE 68457 | $115,742 |
52 | Frederick Brothers Prtshp | Falls City, NE 68355 | $113,679 |
53 | Gabriel D Ramsey | Falls City, NE 68355 | $108,429 |
54 | Joel Rexroth | Humboldt, NE 68376 | $106,984 |
55 | James B Schawang | Falls City, NE 68355 | $106,421 |
56 | Snethen & Sons Heritage Farms Inc | Humboldt, NE 68376 | $103,778 |
57 | Thomas J Goltz | Rulo, NE 68431 | $103,698 |
58 | Tedd Bebermeyer | Hiawatha, KS 66434 | $103,180 |
59 | Stalder Farms LLC | Dunn, NC 28335 | $100,989 |
60 | James E Frederick | Falls City, NE 68355 | $100,748 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”