Total Commodity Programs in Richardson County, Nebraska, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 689
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Richardson County, Nebraska totaled $5,239,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Gilfillan Pure Honey LLC | Falls City, NE 68355 | $29,510 |
42 | Neal E Parsons | Falls City, NE 68355 | $28,345 |
43 | Jeffrey E Findlay | Falls City, NE 68355 | $28,322 |
44 | Ebel Farms Inc | Hiawatha, KS 66434 | $28,198 |
45 | Joel Rexroth | Humboldt, NE 68376 | $27,775 |
46 | Nicholas S Andrew | Nebraska City, NE 68410 | $27,619 |
47 | Paul & Elaine Burgett Rev Trust | Humboldt, NE 68376 | $27,512 |
48 | Jon C Snethen | Falls City, NE 68355 | $27,275 |
49 | David Stalder | Humboldt, NE 68376 | $26,888 |
50 | Howe & Co | Humboldt, NE 68376 | $26,817 |
51 | Keithley Brothers Inc | Verdon, NE 68457 | $26,670 |
52 | James C Frederick - Jimmy | Rulo, NE 68431 | $26,617 |
53 | Snethen & Sons Heritage Farms Inc | Humboldt, NE 68376 | $25,242 |
54 | Kent Knobbe | Falls City, NE 68355 | $24,991 |
55 | Gerald B Scholl | Falls City, NE 68355 | $24,657 |
56 | Stanley Duerfeldt | Falls City, NE 68355 | $24,142 |
57 | Binder Farms Inc | Rulo, NE 68431 | $24,016 |
58 | David Knobbe | Falls City, NE 68355 | $23,853 |
59 | Cedar Farms Inc | Falls City, NE 68355 | $23,746 |
60 | Joe Standerford | Humboldt, NE 68376 | $23,314 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”