Farm Subsidy information
Richardson County, Nebraska
Total Subsidies in Richardson County, Nebraska, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 929
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Richardson County, Nebraska totaled $14,070,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Gayle Kennedy | Falls City, NE 68355 | $25,585 |
82 | Dwaine A Kanel | Humboldt, NE 68376 | $25,555 |
83 | Michael R Hunzeker | Rulo, NE 68431 | $25,493 |
84 | Gerald B Scholl | Falls City, NE 68355 | $25,444 |
85 | Marjorie J Lyons | Kansas City, MO 64151 | $25,440 |
86 | Talbott Family Limited Partnershi | Park Falls, WI 54552 | $25,323 |
87 | Kent Knobbe | Falls City, NE 68355 | $24,991 |
88 | Michael R Finck | Falls City, NE 68355 | $24,824 |
89 | Richard Vonbergen | Dawson, NE 68337 | $24,201 |
90 | Michael L Garriott | Falls City, NE 68355 | $23,902 |
91 | Brenda J Garriott | Falls City, NE 68355 | $23,902 |
92 | David Knobbe | Falls City, NE 68355 | $23,853 |
93 | Cedar Farms Inc | Falls City, NE 68355 | $23,746 |
94 | Rita Chauza | Douglas, NE 68344 | $23,508 |
95 | L J Keithley And Sons Inc | Verdon, NE 68457 | $23,467 |
96 | Raymond R Werner Rev Trust | Roca, NE 68430 | $23,431 |
97 | Joe Standerford | Humboldt, NE 68376 | $23,314 |
98 | William S Stalder | Kansas City, MO 64113 | $23,281 |
99 | Thomas S Stalder | Brainard, NE 68626 | $23,279 |
100 | Benny Charles Sickel | Falls City, NE 68355 | $23,169 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”