Loan Deficiency in Richardson County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1,201 to 1,220 of 1,460
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Richardson County, Nebraska totaled $28,572,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1201 | Gary Richey | Falls City, NE 68355 | $1,211 |
1202 | Dorothea Gerdes | Humboldt, NE 68376 | $1,202 |
1203 | Betty L Gruber | Falls City, NE 68355 | $1,183 |
1204 | Roger Hinrichsen | Dawson, NE 68337 | $1,182 |
1205 | Amy B Nussbaum | Verdon, NE 68457 | $1,177 |
1206 | The Peterson Family Trust | Hiawatha, KS 66434 | $1,155 |
1207 | Leona Porter | Topeka, KS 66675 | $1,147 |
1208 | Barbara Carpenter | Falls City, NE 68355 | $1,134 |
1209 | Delbert Benedict | Omaha, NE 68135 | $1,132 |
1210 | John E Taylor | White Cloud, KS 66094 | $1,130 |
1211 | Luke Avery | Humboldt, NE 68376 | $1,127 |
1212 | Joseph W Schieffelin | Maryville, MO 64468 | $1,127 |
1213 | Alvin Simon | Falls City, NE 68355 | $1,123 |
1214 | Edward Findlay | Table Rock, NE 68447 | $1,123 |
1215 | Donald E James Revoc Trust | Falls City, NE 68355 | $1,121 |
1216 | Charles R James Family Trust | Falls City, NE 68355 | $1,108 |
1217 | Michael Marfice | Table Rock, NE 68447 | $1,107 |
1218 | Kyle Slater | Omaha, NE 68132 | $1,102 |
1219 | Thomas E Reuter | Humboldt, NE 68376 | $1,099 |
1220 | Arthur F Roubik | Falls City, NE 68355 | $1,095 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”