Loan Deficiency in Richardson County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1,341 to 1,360 of 1,460
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Richardson County, Nebraska totaled $28,572,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1341 | Charles Malcolm | Falls City, NE 68355 | $461 |
1342 | Doug Huppert | Salem, NE 68433 | $458 |
1343 | Crib Farms Inc. | Bern, KS 66408 | $454 |
1344 | Zion United Church | Falls City, NE 68355 | $451 |
1345 | Dale & Melissa Hortik Living Trus | Colorado Springs, CO 80906 | $434 |
1346 | Elizabeth Aghbashian & Scott Lee | Manhattan, MT 59741 | $434 |
1347 | Lee Family Trust | Walnut Creek, CA 94598 | $434 |
1348 | Thomas J Witt | Falls City, NE 68355 | $432 |
1349 | Brian Witt | Falls City, NE 68355 | $432 |
1350 | Michael E Witt | Falls City, NE 68355 | $432 |
1351 | Denise J Mertens | Falls City, NE 68355 | $432 |
1352 | Collette Gillispie | Big Sky, MT 59716 | $426 |
1353 | John Stuart Watton | Falls City, NE 68355 | $421 |
1354 | Al Debuhr | Dawson, NE 68337 | $420 |
1355 | Donald E Mcclenahan | Omaha, NE 68135 | $407 |
1356 | Keithley Land & Livestock Inc | Verdon, NE 68457 | $381 |
1357 | Raynelda L Hopta | Paxinos, PA 17860 | $381 |
1358 | Margaret Goodman Estate | Falls City, NE 68355 | $378 |
1359 | Gertrude Capps | Falls City, NE 68355 | $376 |
1360 | Mildred Colson | Kansas City, MO 64116 | $376 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”