Farm Subsidy information
Scotts Bluff County, Nebraska
Total Subsidies in Scotts Bluff County, Nebraska, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 407
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Scotts Bluff County, Nebraska totaled $9,800,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | David A Kaufman | Gering, NE 69341 | $46,188 |
22 | Kevin Scott Thomas | Mitchell, NE 69357 | $45,576 |
23 | , | $45,554 | |
24 | Kenneth Willman | Morrill, NE 69358 | $44,104 |
25 | Bar Eight Cattle Company Inc | Lyman, NE 69352 | $43,224 |
26 | Zeiler Farms LLC | Minatare, NE 69356 | $41,671 |
27 | Mike Sindt | Scottsbluff, NE 69361 | $41,447 |
28 | Chet Cochran Farms Inc | Gering, NE 69341 | $40,127 |
29 | T & R Roth Farms Inc | Gering, NE 69341 | $39,809 |
30 | P M Stricker Inc | Gering, NE 69341 | $39,776 |
31 | Ryan Stricker Farms Inc | Gering, NE 69341 | $39,738 |
32 | Warnar L Schaneman | Scottsbluff, NE 69361 | $38,323 |
33 | Rod Adams Farms Inc | Scottsbluff, NE 69361 | $38,026 |
34 | Virginia Kaufman | Gering, NE 69341 | $37,131 |
35 | Kendall Busch | Scottsbluff, NE 69361 | $36,640 |
36 | Steele Family Farms | Scottsbluff, NE 69361 | $36,014 |
37 | K E B Farms Inc | Scottsbluff, NE 69361 | $35,427 |
38 | Kurt Joel Schaneman | Mitchell, NE 69357 | $35,386 |
39 | Lowe Investments LLC | Norfolk, NE 68701 | $33,776 |
40 | Ethan Ford | Morrill, NE 69358 | $33,204 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”